Thursday 25 November 2010

Beginners Guide to a Bronica

As you've probably guessed by now, I love film photography, and medium format (or 120) is a particular favourite of mine. I've yet to use my twin lens Rolleicord, but i've had a lot of use out of my Zenza Bronica ETRS.



Unlike a lot of medium format cameras (such as Hasselblad, Minolta, and other Bronica's) the ETRS is not square format (6x6). The frame size of an ETRS is 4.5x6 which makes it rectangular. This is very useful when printing from the negatives, as the frame size is very similar to the 8x10 paper size and means that very little cropping of the actual image needs to be done. Bronicas are fairly easy to use once you've had some practice at loading the film, there's a few youtube tutorials which show you how to do it. This is one of them, although it suggests that you have to take the back off the camera in order to load the film which you don't necessarily need to do. This is a pdf of the instruction manual for a Bronica. The image at the top of the pdf looks slightly diffrerent from the previous image of the Bronica that I posted, this is because they have attatched a viewfinder which means that they don't have to look in the top of the camera to view what they are about to photograph which can make shooting a little easier (although I prefer the original method of viewing the frame), here is an example of what I mean:




and this is the viewfinder:
The instruction manual gives diagrams of what each part of the camera does. I have listed them below;





Medium format cameras have an excellent depth of field (or focal length), obviously depending on what type of lens is being used. My Bronica came with a standard 75mm fixed focus lens, which means that it does not have a zoom feature. I absolutely love the quality of the images it produces. I have used it for everything, from studio shoots to location. A roll of 120 film used in a Bronica allows you to take 16 shots, and this means that you have to carefully frame each image to make sure that you don't waste any. The image you see in the viewfinder will be back to front which can be confusing at first, but with some practice it becomes a lot less noticeable.

These are a few images taken with my Bronica ETRS: 



For more of my images taken with an ETRS see my flikr set.

The most common medium format cameras used in fashion photography are Hasselblads or Mamiyas which can be a little more expensive (particularly Hasselblads if in good condion) and if used today are mostly used with digital backs instead of film, which can be in excess of thousands of pounds. Some may argue that these are better quality cameras than those in the Bronica range, and although I am yet to have used any other types of medium format camera, the Bronica is something which I instantly fell in love with. I love the whole process, from loading the film to developing it in the dark room. It is an amazng process. Medium format photography is something which I think everyone who has an active interest in photography should try, and once they have, digital photography will never feel the same.

Sunday 21 November 2010

Final Major Project Case Study on Skinheads

For my Final Major, I chose to concentrate on Skinheads. During one of my early assignments which I based on tattoos, I came across an American white supremacist named Curtis Allgier. His face and body are completely covered in tattoos depicting his controversial views. I became fascinated with how people with such radical views think and act and the reasoning behind why they choose tattoos as a method of getting their opinions across.

I studied photographers such as Nick Knight, who photographed skinheads in the 1970s and 80s. Knight is a former skinhead who is now a very well respected fashion photographer, and his photographs of skinheads are some of my favourite images of all time. They are raw and beautiful and honest. 

Below is the case study that I submitted for my Final Major project to co-incide with the practical part which was also concentrated on skinheads. You can view my photographs on my Flikr photostream. I would welcome any feedback on either my photographs or my report, but please do not steal it!



The Evolution of Skinheads from 1967 to the Present Day.
Final Major Project – Case Study
Student: Lucy Williams                                                 Tutor: Stuart Carter
Friday 14th May, 2010





Contents

3.    Introduction
4.    The Birth of the Skinhead
6.    Decline and Revival
7.    Politics and Racism
10.   Defining Characteristics from the sixties to the Present Day
12.   Tattoos and their Relationship with Skinheads
16.   Conclusion
17.   Other Images
18.   Bibliography

  Introduction

     Throughout this study, I will look at how the skinhead subculture has evolved from its emergence in the late sixties, to its continued popularity amongst the working classes in the present day. I aim to discover the true history of skinheads and identify their origins and beliefs, as well as their political and racial views. I am also going to look at the relevance of tattoos within the subculture, in particular, the relationship with tribalism. By studying work by such photographers as Nick Knight and Gavin Watson, I am going to discover why the resurgence of the subculture in the late seventies and early eighties caused the controversy that surrounds the subject today.


The Birth of the Skinhead

       The word “Skinhead” is often perceived as a negative one. To those who are naïve to their history, skinheads are seen as violent and racist. Although this may be true to some skinheads, the first wave of original (traditional or “trads”) skinheads were born out of a multi-racial bond between working class Mods, teddy boys, and Jamaican immigrants who came to London during the 1960s, who had a strong and united hatred for authority and the ruling classes.
     The Mod scene, which was popular in the early 1960s, had begun to divide. While the middle class mods could afford to keep up the trend of expensive clothes and fashionable haircuts, the working class mods were pushed aside, as they could not afford the same luxuries, and as a result, “hard mods” were born. This new subculture separated itself aesthetically from the middle class mods, by their shaven haircuts and a typical British working class men’s style of the time, which consisted of work boots, shirts, tight jeans and braces. Jamaican influences such as ska, reggae and soul music as well as their mannerisms were picked up by the hard mods as a result of living so close to one another, and with that, the skinhead was born

[1].
Fig 1
 

  Decline and Revival

    This culture was short-lived, and by the early 1970s it had somewhat deteriorated due to media hype over their violent and volatile nature. However, by the late 1970s skinheads had resurfaced in Britain as well as internationally[2]. Nick Knight, author of “Skinhead” (Knight, N, 1982), explains that although there was a decline in skinheads around 1972, they never really died out in the east end of London and in industrial areas of the Midlands. He mentions that with the rise of punks and their rivals, the teddy boys, a new breed of skinheads had appeared with very different views to the trads of 1969, and that each of the opposing groups had their own skinhead supporters. While the supporters of the teddy boys mostly remained traditionalists (although some were pro-British and slightly fascist), the followers of the punks were extremely anti-establishment, anti-royalist and anarchic. These were what are known as “anarcho-skins[3]”. Knight states that “the new skins achieved this by reviving the most extreme elements of the old skinhead style and exaggerating them[4]”. The new breed of skinheads are the most well known, and are the reason why skinheads are seen as figures of racial hatred. As they had adopted certain characteristics of traditional skinheads such as the jeans, boots and braces and occasionally the shaven hairstyles (although this was uncommon amongst the supporters of the punk movement who tended to wear mohawks), they were easily recognisable by the public and were an easy target for the media. The swastika was a common symbol displayed by these skins in the form of facial tattoos, and acted as a mark of intimidation as well as a sign of white power amongst some nationalist skinheads.

Politics and Racism

     In the early days, politics had no place within skinhead culture, and it wasn’t until the re-birth in the seventies that politics began to play its part. The National Front, something which today is depicted as going hand-in-hand with skins, emerged as the leading party for neo-Nazi and white power skins the eighties who were opposed to the Conservative Party in power at the time. Formed in 1967, the National Front was a collaboration between three existing parties; the Racial Preservation Society, the British National Party and the League of Empire Loyalists[5]. They essentially stood for the pride of the British, and were unhappy with the amount of immigrants who were being allowed to live in Britain. Racist skins were an ideal target as supporters, and they were easily persuaded by charismatic party members who promised to “put right” what Thatcher had done wrong. Below are some photographs taken by Ian Berry, who has photographed National Front demonstrations and rallies from 1980-2004 which mostly feature skinheads.

  
Fig 2 and 3
     The political side to the skinhead revival is also featured in “This is England”, a British cult film about a 12 year old boy who befriends a group of skins. Director Shane Meadows, who was once a skin himself, comments on the National Front as painting a picture of a “Chruchillian vision of Asian families rowing into the white cliffs of Dover on boats, and that the skinheads would be on the beaches fighting to stop them entering the country”[6]. He states that this is an appealing mindset to adopt as a young working class skinhead, witnessing people in your town in a dire state of poverty due to unemployment, when parties such as the National Front are pointing the finger of blame at immigrants.    
    As I previously stated, the most common misconception shared today about skinheads is that they are all racist. This statement is undeniably true for a small section of the subculture, but the majority of skinheads, particularly traditional skins and members of the Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice (or S.H.A.R.Ps) section of the subculture hold absolutely no racist views. This resonates through the music that they listen to, such as reggae and two-tone, aptly named because they put black and white musicians together to create ska[7]. Media hype and concentration on the small section of neo-Nazi skins, white supremacists such as Curtis Allgier (pictured on the next page), have led people to believe that being a skinhead is a precursor to being a racist. Allgier is currently being held at Salt Lake Penitentiary for charges including capital murder. He was arrested in Salt Lake City on June 25th 2007 after he shot and killed a corrections officer transporting him to a hospital[8].  In an interview for American television channel MSNBC, Allgier freely admits to being a skinhead. He says that “being a skinhead is a way of life, it’s preserving your race, it’s being proud of who you are[9]”.


Fig 4
    However, there is a distinct difference between a neo-Nazi skinhead, which Allgier is, and a traditional skinhead. It is acutely obvious, just from looking at him, that he is racist. His tattoos are mostly symbols with Nazi affiliations. He bears countless swastikas, as well as symbols such as the number “14”, which stands for the 14 word slogan of white supremacists; “we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children”, as shown in the image above. Allgier is what could be described as one of the “new breed” of skinheads, as described in Nick Knight’s book. This new generation of skins, particularly in America, became increasingly racist, and adopted the tough style and attitude of traditional skins and simply exaggerated it.
      As Allgier appeared on numerous news stories across America, it is easy to see why someone who knows nothing about the multi-cultural history of skins would assume that he is what could be described as “typical” of skinheads, when in fact he is in a very small minority. As with any subculture, the media have a tendency to pick the most negative aspects to broadcast, because they will cause the most controversy, and it is this which has brought about the negative image of skinheads that still resonates today.


Defining Characteristics from the Sixties to the Present Day
     With the majority of traditional skins coming from working class backgrounds, it was common that a lot of skinheads were uneducated. Included in Knight’s book, which is essentially a walk-through guide to skinheads and includes photographs he had take during the 1970s, is a letter written by “Harry the Duck”, a 16 year old skin from East London, in 1981. This boy is what could be described as a “typical” skinhead, and as Knight describes; “he is awkward and not especially bright. He is not articulate and he can hardly write. His opinions are none too savoury (still less kosher). He is not a pretty sight”. Knight asked him to write down what he liked about being a skinhead.


Fig 5
 According to Shane Meadows, skinheads were “amongst Britain's first anti-racists, mixing with newly arrived waves of West Indian immigrants with whom they indulged a mutual love of reggae and ska[10]”. This was during 1969 and 1972, and from their revival onward they have become increasingly associated with racism and neo-Nazi ideologies.
     This is England draws light upon the poverty that many working class skinheads faced during the 1980s as well as being poorly educated, indicated by their language and their use of colloquialisms. The film also illustrates their alcohol and drug use, something which photographer Peter Marlow discovered when he met with a group of skinheads from Essex, around the same time that the film was set. His images show young skins sniffing glue on the seafront.
 
Fig 6, 7 & 8
    

Tattoos and their Relationship with Skinheads

One of the most defining characteristics of skinheads is their tattoos. Used as a symbol of pride, intimidation, or racial hatred, tattoos have always been a part of skinhead culture. The word Tattoo originates from the Tahitian words “Tatu” or “Tatau”, “Ta” meaning to mark or strike (according to www.designboom.com’s brief history of tattoos), however, there is no real evidence to suggest that Tahiti was the birthplace of the tattoo. There are a few information sources which claim to know of the first example of a tattooed person. J. Tithonus Pednaud of Made Marvels (www.thehumanmarvels.com) claims that a slave from the Philippines named Prince Giolo, who was put on display by William Dampier in 1691, was the first example of a tattooed man.


Fig 9 – Prince Giolo

Dampier described him as "painted all down the breast, between his shoulders and behind; on his thighs (mostly) before; and in the form of several broad rings or bracelets, round his arms and legs.”[11]

    One of the most famous discoveries of “the first tattooed man” is that of Ötzi, found near Hauslabjoch in the Ötzal Alps on September 19, 1991 (and was subsequently named Ötzi after his place of discovery) by two German hikers. It is highly likely that he was the first example of a tattooed man, as it is estimated that he is around 5300 years old, carbon dated to about 3300BC[12]. The tattoos that covered his body consisted of lines and dots in certain areas, post mortems revealed that he had arthritis in these areas and it was therefore suggested that his tattoos were applied in relation to acupuncture (although there is no evidence for this)[13].

     According to Henk Schiffmacher, author of “1000 Tattoos” (Schiffmacher, H, 2001, TESCHEN), the original meanings of many tribal tattoos, such as those of the Berbers and the Samoans, are that they were applied for medicinal purposes (against rheumatism). This is also common in Egypt and South Africa. These tattoos consisted of a series of patterns, dots and lines in particular areas of the body such as along the back of the leg from the ankle to the knee, because they believed that this could protect against illness. Many tattoos held by tribe members can only be roughly translated, their true meanings may never be discovered as they date back thousands of years and are surrounded by a great deal of mystery as to how they came to be. However, they also serve as a guide to the history of tribes-people through non verbal communication in the deciphering and analysis of tattoos and markings on the body.
  
     The tattoos held by skinheads are very similar to tribal tattoos, in that they are a re-occurring aspect of the whole subculture. As well as some being in “code”, the tattoos displayed by neo-Nazi skinheads such as Curtis Allgier are a prime example for example. One of his tattoos, the numbers “88”, which represent the words “Heil Hitler” (the 8 stands for the eighth letter of the alphabet)[14], are something which other neo-Nazi skins would understand the meaning of.
Tattoos such as “Made in England” for example were commonly displayed on the heads and throats of some skins, such as the photograph taken from Knight’s “Skinhead” of a young man being led away by a police officer wearing the words “MADE IN BRITIAN” proudly on his forehead. The word “skinhead” or “skins” is an extremely common tattoo used amongst skinheads, and can be tattooed anywhere from the face to the fingers as a symbol of self pride.


    Football was also an important part of skinhead culture, and as a result, football related tattoos also became extremely popular. Emblems of the Union Jack are common amongst nationalist and traditional skinheads, as well as images of bulldogs and other symbols relating to British pride. These act as a badge of honour and something which displays loyalty to their country.


  
Fig 13 & 14




Conclusion


    Having researched many aspects of the subculture, it is clear that society’s views about skinheads are fairly misled. Largely perceived as racist, their origins of a multi-cultural alliance against the ruling classes and authority are forgotten by most. Admittedly, I assumed this presumption before my research was conducted, mainly because of the negative press that skinheads receive, their intimidating appearance, and the depiction of racial hatred in such films as “American History X” and “This is England”. This controversial subculture is often disregarded by those who can only scratch the surface of something which is much deeper than they could ever imagine it to be. From the films I have watched and the books and articles that I have read, I have gained an appreciation for those who come from nothing and stand up for what they believe in. 
      Although I do not condone the violent and volatile nature that the majority of skinheads demonstrate, I feel it necessary to draw light upon the reason that they exist today, and to make sure that their origins within West Indian culture are not forgotten.


[1] http://libcom.org/history/1960-today-skinhead-culture
[2] From the sections “Decline” and “Revival", Knight, N, 1982, Skinhead, Omnibus Press
[3] From the definition given by: www.skinheadrevolt.com
[4] Page 23, line 22, Knight, N, 1982, Skinhead, Omnibus Press
[5] http://www.national-front.org.uk/nfhistory.htm
[6] http://www.thisisenglandmovie.co.uk/#/skinhead/ from the section “Skinhead 80s”
[7] http://invereskstreet.blogspot.com/2009/09/skinheads-cult-of-trouble-by-ian-walker.html
[8] http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/08/23/face-of-hate-curtis-allgier-explained/
[9] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3u5yH3ryH4
[10] http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1617295,00.html, - Christopher Thompson, Time Magazine 2007.
[11] J. Tithonus Pednaud; http://princegiolo.blogspot.com/2007/11/who-is-prince-giolo.html
[12]History of Tattoos” – Designboom, http://www.designboom.com/history/tattoo_history.html
[13]History of Tattoos – Bronze Age” – Designboom, http://www.designboom.com/history/tattoo_history.html
[14] Curtis Allgier’s Tattoos and their Meanings; http://www.deseretnews.com/photos/4295133a.jpg

Lomography

Lomography is also something that I am very interested in. It is defined as being a "new take on an old style of analogue photography". It takes its name from the Lomo L-CA, a camera produced during the Communist period in St Petersburg, Russia, although the design has been recently brought up by a Swiss company who have marketed it as a "fashion-camera" (sold in places such as Urban Outfitters and vintage camera shops).

It has had a bit of a resurge in the past few years, particularly the Diana camera which was originally produced in Hong Kong in the 60s and 70s as a toy camera, as its body was made entirely of plastic except for the lens. The flimsy nature of the plastic body and the sub-par lens meant that light often leaked in to the camera damaging the film, and producing a dream-like fuzzy image with little contrast.

The ten golden rules of lomography according to lomography.com are as follows:
  1. Take your camera everywhere you go
  2. Use it any time – day and night
  3. Lomography is not an interference in your life, but part of it
  4. Try the shot from the hip
  5. Approach the objects of your Lomographic desire as close as possible
  6. Don't think (William Firebrace)
  7. Be fast
  8. You don't have to know beforehand what you captured on film
  9. Afterwards either
  10. Don't worry about any rules



These are a few photographs I took with my Diana F+, which takes 120 roll film letting you create panoramic shots and multiple exposures.  For more see my Flikr

The Diana is a great camera and extremely simple to use. It has two settings, automatic and a B setting, so that you can hold the shutter open for night time exposures. This is a great website for explaining all about Diana cameras and various items that you can get for them (such as an instant back, a 35mm back, flash, splitzer and clone cameras).

The Lomography.com shop charges about £45 for a Diana F+ as standard, and comes with an instruction manual, a book and a leaflet showing examples of shots taken in various different methods so all in all it is a very good value camera. 120 film is about £3-£4 a roll depending on where you buy it, Lomography produce their own film which i've yet to try, although I bought some 35mm lomography film a few days ago which was £7.99 for 3! They sell a lot of different types of film including red scale (which adds a red/yellow tint to the negative), and when you click on the type it shows a selection of photographs taken with it so you can see the results. The Lomography website is great although you can get second hand versions of a few of the items on ebay if you want to get them a little cheaper.

Developing the film is a little more difficult, 120 film is pretty hard to get developed unless you have a specialist shop nearby, although you can send off to get them done from a few different places. This site offers a few links to some places that develop film both in the UK and abroad, and also offers links to places where you can buy your own chemicals to develop your film yourself! I live in Liverpool and I go to a great place called MPS Imaging. They charge about £3.50 for dev only which is what I usually get as I have a negative scanner, but prints aren't much more. They have a full price list on their website.

Saturday 20 November 2010

Sharing The Wealth; Polish Photographer Pitor Zgodzinski

I was on Flikr the other day searching for photographs taken with twin lens cameras and in particular, the Rolleicord I got as an early Christmas present. I came across THIS photostream by a Polish photographer called Pitor Zgodzinski. On his profile, he claims to "paint with light, not with the Photoshop" which is exactly what I try to do with my photographs. People seem to have lost the whole concept of how to use the available light to your advantage, as the common view held today is that they can just edit the photograph later. This is one of the reasons why I love film photography in its purest form, with little editing except that done in the dark room.



These are NOT my photographs, click here for Zgodzinski's photostream 

Those are just a few of my favourite photographs from his photostream, they show the beauty of analogue photography, as well as TLR cameras. On almost every photograph he states which type of camera was used as well as the film type, the aperture and the type of lighting, which is usually always the available light. A lot of photographers today are very reluctant to share their secrets which is a great shame, and the ones that do show a true passion for photography and a willingness to teach others.

Friday 19 November 2010

Expired Film

Expired film is something which I have been interested in using for a while. I acquired two rolls of expired film yesterday from The Real Camera Company in Manchester, one from 2008 and one from 1981. Expired film can produce a variety of results depending on how it has been stored. From THIS website, I found that undeveloped film changes over time. The results of different storage methods are as followed:

  •  High storage temperatures accelerate change;
  •  Low temperatures slow it.
  •  Freezing stops it;
  •  Humidity accelerates it.
  •  Dry storage helps minimize it


Expired polaroid film from this blog about polaroids and analogue photography
(which is extremely interesting)

 The "use by" date is, typically, two years from the month in which the film was packaged, although the factories must assume that a lot of the film is going to be stored on a shelf in a warm shop (when it should be stored in a fridge) and so the "process before" date is actually many months before any deterioration is likely to be visible.

This website suggests that film stored at room temperature is still likely to produce excellent quality images long after its expiry date, and that film only stored in conditions which are higher than room temperature will give a deteriorated image. However, exposed film will deteriorate much more rapidly, as exposure causes a physical change to the silver halide in the light sensitive layer, which slowly spreads to the near by crystals in "a kind of chain reaction". If you cannot process your film promptly, it is suggested that you store your exposed film in a fridge or freezer as it can show loss of colour quality as soon as six to ten weeks after exposure.

So what are the benefits of using expired film?

Well, as expired film can change the colour quality and contrast, you can produce some pretty weird-looking images with an antique feel.





These images are from this Hemmings Car Collectors blog

The photographer used a Holga and some expired Fuji Pro film. He "yanked the mask" from the camera to create the unpredictable light leaks, less defined boarders on the frame, as well as the blurring and vignetting. As you can see, the colours are slightly off, which is the result of using the expired film.

I love the look it creates, as well as the unpredictability. I'm very excited to try out my expired film!

Liquifying and Airbrushing

I recently watched an online tutorial on liquifying, which is something I have never tried before. Liquifying is a Photoshop technique which is used to make objects or people larger or smaller.

I found this tutorial to be extremely useful. These are some of the images that I practiced on yesterday:



Click on the images to see a larger version

The first image is just a self portrait taken a while ago. I used the liquify tool to make my nose slightly smaller, my top lip a little fuller and my cheeks narrower. I also used THIS airbrushing tutorial to make my skin smoother. The second image is of my friend Allie. I took this photograph as part of a set when I first got my studio lighting equipment to test them out. I used this photograph because I wanted to practice on full length model shot, NOT because I thought she needed to look any smaller! I also used the airbrushing tutorial again, and altered the levels to make the black areas a little more dramatic.

The Improssible Project

The Impossible Project is the company which took over Polaroid after it's closure and effectively saved instant analogue photography from becoming extinct, which would have meant over 300,000,000 polaroid cameras would have become obsolete.

The Photographer's Gallery Book Shop in London is somewhere which I definitely need to visit. They have the UK's largest collection of photography books, magazines, merchandise and unusual cameras and looks like somewhere I would absolutely love!

Introduction

Yesterday I went to Manchester with my mum so that we could go to the Real Camera Company for my christmas present. I found a beautiful Rolleicord TLR, which I fell in love with instantly. Rolleicords were produced between 1934 and 1976, by Franke & Heidecke and were a slightly less expensive version of the Rolleiflex.

Although I had originally wanted a Rolleiflex, the salesman explained to me that the Rolleicord was much simpler and was a better choice for a first time TLR user. He also told me that although this particular Rolleicord was slightly more expensive than the two Rolleiflex's they had in the shop, it would increase in value over time if its condition was maintained. The knowledge of the exployees at Real Camera was excellent and you could tell that they had a passion for cameras, unlike a few of the shops in Liverpool I have previously been to and would not go to again.

I was given 3 free rolls of film, as well as the camera strap and the manual which was in perfect condition. Two of the rolls of film that I had asked for were expired, one was from 1981 and I am extremely excited to see the results as I have always wanted to use expired film and have not been able to get hold of it for a reasonable price. (Real Camera charge £2 for a roll of 120 expired film, and I probably should have bought more than two!)

Real Camera is an amazing shop and I would reccomend it to anybody looking to purchase film, cameras, lenses and pretty much anything you could think of to do with analogue photography.